July 05, 2022

Does Sea Moss help in Wound Healing?

Sea moss has been recognized to provide skin advantages for a long time, has been consumed as whole food since ancient times, and is economically significant. It was originally used to ease pain in the 4th century BC when it was used to cure sunburn. But it wasn't until the 1980s, two millennia later, that seaweed was taken seriously, with both the elements and compounds inside the plant being studied and wound healing qualities discovered. New research has shown Sea Moss to strengthen connective tissue and reduce healing time after invasive treatments. In addition, its diverse nutritional profile provides the body with all it needs to restore and strengthen itself.

Sea moss- Alginate dressing

Sea moss consists of several bioactive compounds. These bioactive molecules not only preserve sea moss, but they also have a high nutritional value and several human health advantages. For example, polysaccharides derived from sea moss have a beneficial effect on the digestive system. Alginates are bioactive compounds which are collected from brown algae and are extensively used in pharmaceutical products. This finding led to the invention of the alginate dressing. Alginate dressings are nonwoven materials made from seaweed. They are very absorbent, have mild hemostatic characteristics, minimize bacterial infections, and can stay on the wound bed for days. They are developed for moderately to extensively exuding wounds. Because of its beneficial effect on the immune system, sea moss includes potassium chloride, which helps the body reduce inflammation, and individuals take it to minimize their risk of infection.

Sea moss- Anti-inflammatory characteristics

Alginates are marine brown seaweed species widely recognized for their anti-inflammatory properties, aiding in repairing injured skin. Alginates are now commonly utilized for a variety of wounds, including minor injuries, more complex wounds, skin transplants, and even burns. This alginate feature has just been added to stoma products and has proven helpful in healing irritated and injured skin around a stoma. In addition, many ostomates have discovered that utilizing an alginate flange/baseplate provides immediate comfort to their skin. Many are now using it long-term to maintain and enhance skin integrity.

Sea moss-rich nutritional constituents

Essential nutrients, vitamins, minerals, and dietary fibres are abundant in sea moss. Bromine, sulphur, iodine, calcium, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, potassium, selenium, protein, pectin, beta-carotene, zinc, vitamin C, and B-vitamins are all vital nutrients for the human body. When it comes to wound healing, eating healthy can help you heal quicker and prevent infection. Your body needs protein, hydration, vitamin A, vitamin C, and zinc throughout the healing process. That’s why sea moss is the most acceptable source of these nutrients for wound healing.

Final thoughts

It has been clear from the above studies that sea moss has a significant role in wound healing which cannot be underestimated. Therefore, you should take it immediately to boost your normal wound healing and reduce inflammation. It will wow you with how beneficial it is to you. So, supplement your regular vitamin and mineral intake with this superfood available at Herbal Vineyards.

References

Salehi, B., Sharifi-Rad, J., Seca, A. M. L., Pinto, D. C. ,Michalak, I., et al (2019). Current Trends on Seaweeds: Looking at Chemical Composition, Phytopharmacology, and Cosmetic Applications. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 24(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/MOLECULES24224182

Sakthivel, R., & Devi, K. P. (2019). Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anticancer potential of natural bioactive compounds from seaweeds. Studies in Natural Products Chemistry, 63, 113–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817901-7.00005-8

Janarthanan, M., & Senthil Kumar, M. (2018). Extraction of alginate from brown seaweeds and evolution of bioactive alginate film-coated textile fabrics for wound healing application: Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/1528083718783331, 49(3), 328–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083718783331